|
Name: Margaret
|
|
|
There can be no better illustration of the complete and utter delusion of the left than to see how many of them still believe that Bristol Palin gave birth to one baby in April and another in December of the same year. WAKE UP: your baby deception theory is totally busted, so continuing to peddle it just makes you look like an idiot. And if you're looking for a Manchurian president, the current incumbent is a much more likely candidate.
|
|
|
|
Name: bracelladrile
|
|
|
hello, this my first post. dsfcsvcbyjyui
cxzc
http://sdfsd.com
|
|
|
|
Name: totalhealthspecialist
|
|
|
It was a great gift from the god when we noticed we are pregnant. 
|
|
|
|
Name: fresh
|
|
|
Sarah Palin should get with the 21s century and stop holding incitful rallies with the tea party and educate her children about birth control (all that is necessary to not become a teenage pregnant) and stop trying to make problems for the Democratic Administration which seems to be doing well--she needs to be at home and take care of her personal affairs  :
|
|
|
|
Name: Anomynous
|
|
|
Bristol Palin is HOT
|
Let eHarmony match you with quality singles looking for a long-term relationship
|
|
Name: Anonymous
|
|
|
What in the world... Why do you even have to go to the point of making a website dedicated to the pregnancy of Sarah Palin's daughter?! So what?! WHO CARES?! You are using her daughter to BRING DOWN the image of her mother? What is wrong with you- Fool! Sarah Palin's family or not, ABSTINENCE STILL IS THE BEST CHOICE THERE IS. YOU SAY THAT ABSTINENCE IS FAULTY- WELL, IT ISN'T. YOU NOW WHY? BECAUSE HER DAUGHTER DID NOT EVEN ABSTAIN! SO HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT IT DID NOT PROTECT HER FROM A PREGNANCY?! THAT WAS ONLY BECAUSE SHE DID NOT- I REPEAT, DID NOT ABSTAIN! The world we live in today is in chaos! Morality vanished, dignity being taken for granted, and all possible works of satan are starting to arise.
If you want to live in a world where the practice of "safe sex", prevails, then you might as well be living in Hell. Sex is ONLY ONLY ONLY RESERVED FOR YOUR SPOUSE. NOBODY ELSE.
Oh yeah? You say that your contraceptives are full-proof eh? Well, if that's your mentality- then you must be unexposed to condom manufacturers' warnings that they are still not 100% reliable.
I am very sure that there are still thousands of girls- using contraceptives, who have still become pregnant.
And you actually go up to the point of selling merchandise? "My Mom told me to abstain, and all I got was this baby bump." WHAT IN THE WORLD? SERIOUSLY! HOW DARE YOU EVEN SAY THAT.
A LOT OF PEOPLE STILL BELIEVE IN ABSTINENCE. UNLIKE YOUR KIND- CHEAP, WHO GET IT ON EVERY NIGHT WITH A DIFFERENT PERSON, GIVING ALL THEY'VE GOT.
IT'S BECAUSE OF YOU PEOPLE, WHY THERE ARE BROKEN FAMILIES AND BRAIN WASHED KIDS, IN THE FIRST PLACE.
SARAH PALIN WAS JUST DOING THE RIGHT THING. SHE WAS ASHAMED OF HER DAUGHTER'S BEHAVIOR, AND THEREFORE- LIKE ANY TRUE MOTHER, WOULD DO, WOULD PROTECT HER DAUGHTER'S IMAGE. SHE WAS SMART ENOUGH TO THINK OF CLAIMING IT AS HER OWN CHILD.
STOP IT WITH THIS WEBSITE. IT'S A PIECE OF TRASH. NOBODY WANTS TO HEAR ABOUT YOUR LAME REASON FOR A PROTEST.
THAT IS HER OWN FAMILY YOU ARE DEALING WITH HEAR. POLITICS DOESN'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT HER DAUGHTER. WOULD IT ALTER SARAH PALIN'S PERSONALITY?
SOMETIMES, YOU HAVE TO THINK OF WHAT TO SAY FIRST- BEFORE EXERCISING YOUR RIGHT TO SPEAK OUT.
THIS IS A FAMILY MATTER OF HERS. IT'S NOT EVEN YOUR RIGHT TO OPENLY DISCUSS A FAMILY ISSUE.
SUCH IMBECILES SHOULD BE CONDEMNED.
|
|
|
|
Name: Message to the Right
|
|
|
Nice try, Mr. Conductor. You need to shovel that coal elsewhere and get on down the tracks! Your Teabag Express to Dumbassville is late. Progressives are onto your kind's head games. You people are like the friggin' Riddler from the old Batman series. You can't hide your evil agendas despite yourselves. You love bragging about them too much! All we on the left need to learn how to do is dissociate ourselves from your Orwellian hypno-babble that is the vast right wing conspiracy which your self-appointed Queen likes to flippantly call the "lame stream" media. We've learned our lessons well in the past year and a half. Many of you talk about birth certificates. Methinks you protest too much. Now, why would that be? Maybe because there were some controversial 'births' on your side of the fence whose certificates might not agree with the stories that have been fed to the public? The issue here is credibility. If this woman who shall remain nameless would even have the gall to try to pull off a fake pregnancy, imagine the depths of deviousness into which she could descend given the power of being one tick away from the Presidency. The thought is spine-tinglingly Machiavellian/Rovian, but with a faux-feminista gun-nut separatist twist. She's like a goddamn Dickens character! I believe she has been groomed, since before McCain, perhaps in a Manchurian Candidate type program. Didn't she look all too gleeful pointing that soldier's automatic weapon? And please, please, for the love of goodness people, don't get it twisted: Nobody is afraid of this woman! I can repeat that if you want... No? Ok, so maybe Todd. But it seems that everyone who is around her for mare than a quick photo-op picks up enough dirt to bury her. We smug elitists here on the Left, (a lot of us the 90% who don't have most of the wealth), are content to wait until this dingbat throws her hat into the next campaign, then it'll all come out in the laundry. Trust me.
|
|
|
|
Name: Teapartyconductor
|
|
|
This article is obviously written by another left wing extremist piece of garbage. It's idiotic articles like this one that is written to tear down and smear Sarah Palin and her family, when in fact all the articles just bring more attention to her.
It's hard for me to believe that all these blind, brainwashed sheeple called liberal democrats, can cut this good woman down and try to destroy her....and why?.....because she loves her country and fights for its freedom.
I can't wait for November when all these moron liberals like Reid and Pelosi and many others, receive their pink slips.
From November on....That Anti-American Pig named Obama will be a lame duck surrounded by conservative republicans. Good riddance all you democratic scum.
|
|
|
|
Name: Donald Hugaboom
|
|
|
Dear Bristol,
I am single father of a 1 1/2 year old son. I know you are strong on speak with young teen girls on abstinences until marriage; however, how are you approaching the teen boys with being responsible a father to the child as well. I means girls do not become pregnant by themselves; and I believe someone need to spoke to the young father as well. Now, can we convince them to stay "NO"; but, perhaps someone can talk to them about being responsible and help the girl they impregnated because whether they like or not they are apart of that child's life as well.
|
|
|
|
Name: Mel
|
|
|
That picture has been dated to 2006. Maybe Bristol was pregnant, but not with the baby we know as Trig. I admire your perseverance. Don't give up, because somebody other than Sarah Palin gave birth to that baby.
|
Take 20% orders of $20 or more!
|
|
Name: Margaret
|
|
|
Oh boy. When your site starts being a venue for viagara spam maybe it's time to shut it down....?
|
|
|
|
Name: Mad
|
|
|
I'm so tired of you people lying about and picking on Bristol.
Leave her and her baby Tripp alone!
Anyone who still believes in "Babygate" needs help.
Your hatred of the Palin family is blinding you.
|
|
|
|
Name: Margaret
|
|
|
Incidentally, pictures don't constitute proof. Google Images for "kidman pregnant mgm awards". There are a number of pictures of Nicole Kidman at 7 months in a silver dress and pink background. In the side shots she looks like she has a cannonball in there, in the front shots it barely shows. Guess which angle is in the Bree Palin pictures!
|
|
|
|
Name: Margaret
|
|
|
Hangingon, maybe you should do your own homework. I was responding specifically to General Hypocricy, who said "Her moral objective is to preach abstinence only, yet it is something that has failed within her own family". It's easy to throw around hateful talking points, but how about a reasonable discussion instead.
|
|
|
|
Name: HangingOn
|
|
|
Oh, and Margaret, you certainly seem to have done your homework - not.
You think people are coming down on Sarah and her daughter because their abstinence-only campaign is a huge failure and the proof is in the babies.
My suggestion to you would be to remember that this woman is signing petitions and speaking to electorates and trying to sway political opinion. The venom that you speak of is directed towards a hypocrite (and, in light of lying about her son, a liar) who wants everyone to adopt her way of thinking. The media has hardly gone near the Trig parentage question, so this boo-hooing about the media and how mean it is about this actually is a false claim.
They do mention the Trig parentage rumour in the Fox news clip though, lol! Wow, I guess even Fox heard the rumours, and had to hide the video so nobody would know that even they they had their suspicions!
Go check out the video at Bree Palin.
|
|
|
Name: HangingOn
|
|
|
I have to laugh at everyone insisting that two pregnancies from one person are not possible because of the dates given. And whoever said Sarah would have to *cover up* a second pregnancy. This seems to imply that she had already been covering up a first pregnancy!
And Bristol should keep her newborn at home! Yeah - just like Trig was kept at home during the convention last year!
So here is what we know now -
Sarah Palin is no longer Governor and we have no real explanation as to why she quit.
Bristol Palin seems to have a baby named Tripp - first she says abstinence is not realistic, then she says it is, then she says.... nothing. No sign of her Candies campaign continuing.
We would not know who Bristol is, or whether or not she was pregnant once, twice, or at all, if her mother said nothing about her. So let me clarify here a point on whether or not *children* are off-limits:
BRISTOL BEING ON THE COVER OF PEOPLE, BRISTOL ON GVS FOX NEWS INTERVIEW, and BRISTOL DOING CANDIES PROMOTIONS means BRISTOL IS NO LONGER JUST A PRIVATE CITIZEN, and NO LONGER A CHILD. And we have the right to ask as many questions as we like about her or her actions.
SARAH PALIN WAS GOVERNOR OF ALASKA AND WAS VP NOMINEE 2008. SARAH PALIN SPEAKS PUBLICLY ON POLITICAL ISSUES. AND WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO ASK AS MANY QUESTIONS ABOUT HER AS WE LIKE.
So, now for some of those questions... such as
Why have all of the facts (amniocentesis was done... abortion was considered...) been saved until AFTER Trigs birth.
Why does the one - ONE - picture of Sarah appearing pregnant not only get scrubbed from the internet (anonymous Flicker account belonging to nobody who will or has admitted it) but flies directly in the face of every flight attendant on the wild ride from Texas - Alaska who said her pregnancy was NOT APPARENT UPON OBSERVATION.
So - you all can tell she was pregnant by looking at that one picture, when there had to have been at least two airline attendants who spoke to her or at the very least who saw her in person, and saw no reason to believe she was pregnant at all.
One picture, she looks pregnant. Plenty of pictures when she was supposed to be pregnant and looked most clearly and undeniably un-pregnant! And most of which have been SCRUBBED FROM THE INTERNET!!!
So let us do this without mentioning Bristol to appease all of the *think of the children* types reading this.
Sarah Palin lied about her pregnancy. This has nothing to do with any of her daughters, or any baby. THIS IS ABOUT SARAH PALIN, who lied about being pregnant on the national stage.
If she DID give birth to Trig, there would be proof when reporters came calling to expose the story as a hoax. The Alaska Daily News tried to prove Sarah DID give birth to Trig and COULD NOT - why... because THEY COULD NOT GATHER ANY INFORMATION OR EVIDENCE PROVING SHE DID!!!
Bree Palin has video clearly showing Sarah Palin ten days before birth - and five days before the hugely pregnant looking photo - looking very, very un-pregnant. If anyone thinks she went from hiding it so well that nobody could tell by looking, to, five days later, looking unmistakably pregnant... well, then, I guess they will just believe anything they are told and would prefer not to *see* truth when it makes them feel like an idiot for just taking someone at face value.
See Bree Palin Sept. 26th post for proof that Sarah Palin, US VP nominee for 2008, faked her fifth pregnancy with Trig Paxton Van Palin. And there are a lot of people involved in the cover-up - including the good doctor Johnson, the Johnston family, some at Fox news (must be why they buried the video footage of Sarah looking super-slim ten days before *giving birth* for 17 months!), and some in the Republican party.
When the lid blows, a lot of you who took her at her word - dates of birth, details of labour, bridge to nowhere, death panels, Willow rape joke, etc. - will just have to question things a little more in the future. And the lid is blowing soon, since this Fox video is about to hit the MSM and all outlets in between.
|
|
|
|
Name: Margaret
|
|
|
Kay, I have said many times that I am not defending Sarah Palins, per se, I am commenting on the demonization of her and her daughter, when they are just going through the same thing that 750,000 other American families go through every year. They thought abstinence would work, others thought birth control would work. The end result is the same (pregnancy), and those that don't go through it know very well that they were just lucky. Whatever else you think of Palin, why would any decent person heap ridicule and venom on her for this? Some people are even giving David Letterman a pass for his tasteless "jokes", if it had been ANYONE else he would have been universally condemned. And it would be nice if I could get a real answer that doesn't just regurgitate some warmed up talking points that have nothing to do with the issue.
|
|
|
|
Name: Steph
|
|
|
And a lot of people who have chastised the Palins make me sick. 
The child that I am carrying is evidence that birth control is not 100% effective. Yes, I was taking BCP (and yes, I was actually taking them). Just goes to show that there's a reason birth control is only 99% effective, even when used correctly.
|
|
|
|
Name: Kay
|
|
|
Margaret, you speak of Palin's opinions as being well-founded, yet it seems they are not her opinions but Newt Gingrich's opinions since she plagiarized most of her last speech from his writings. Of course, however, she tried to cover up her lies with a mere mentioning of his name. She is a fake, liar, and not fit to serve in public office. However, I would like to say that agree with your statement that if your son were to impregnant a girl his college would be over. But, Palin's daughter will go to college; the tax payers will foot that bill as an unwed mother; she can get loans, grants, federal funding. These backalley Republicans make me sick.
|
|
|
|
Name: Margaret
|
|
|
GH, I don’t know where you are located, but I doubt you can hang all of those 750,000 unplanned pregnancies on a lack of sex-ed. I’d like to find an American teenager who has never heard of condoms or birth control pills. The important part of sex education is not the biology (which is probably already covered in the health classes you mention) but the whole context of sex: is it just something you just do for recreational pleasure, or is it connected to settling down in a committed relationship. Do you really want some teacher - with who knows what kind of agenda - instructing your child in this regard? This is the PARENT'S prerogative and duty.
While I agree that times have changed, I don’t think the mildly permissive attitude of “we’d rather you didn’t, but if you do…” serves kids very well. As adults we know that, if a girl starts having sex at age 14, she will probably be feeling like a used tissue by the time she is 18 or 19. If she is lucky, she will come away with just the dawning realisation that all those eager adolescent boys were not in love with her, just after her body. If not, she could be carrying some emotional baggage into her adult years, along with an STD or two, and maybe even be “punished” with a baby (no contraceptive is 100% effective). Delegating this momentous decision to her at an age where we would probably veto a tattoo or nose-ring is crazy. Call me idealistic, but I think that instilling one's values (including respect for others), raising a confident child who can resist peer pressure, maintaining adequate supervision, and putting in some level of fear of the consequences, can work at least as well as just giving up and handing out condoms or pills. (My son has known since the age of 12 that if he knocks a girl up, his promised university education is toast, he’ll have to get a job to support the girl and the baby and we'll be doing a world cruise with the money. I’ll bet that gives him at least some cause to pause).
In any case, I am neither religious nor a Palin adherent, I am simply pointing out that I think there is actually a reasonable case for teaching abstinence, at least as an option. Disagree with Sarah Palin if you like, but I don’t see why she should be demonized for her opinion, or why it should be discounted because in one particular case it didn’t work out.
|
|
|