|
Name: Margaret
|
|
|
Thanks, DD, and I'm glad the charity will benefit, however I don't really want to be part of your Irish baby theory, which is even less logical than the original Trig theory. Do the math: even if Tripp was born yesterday (which he obviously wasn't) it is still only 10 months since Trig's birth. The idea that Bristol had the means, opportunity, desire, physical condition and fertility to conceive less than a month after giving birth is simply inconceivable, if you'll pardon the pun. According to you, Sarah Palin had just put her entire career on the line to "cover up" the first pregnancy, do you really think she would leave the two lovebirds alone to cause a repeat problem? Or are you saying that she was so far-sighted she could foresee there might be a need for another "dupe" 4 months later - so she encouraged them to "go for it"?
Can't we leave these people alone now, we have bigger problems to worry about.
|
|
|
|
Name: Double Dupe is over
|
|
|
Finally, the end play has happened. There's an actual baby named Tripp just introduced >7 weeks after alleged birth. Incredible to consider Irish baby scenario as I now believe. Yep, looks like Bristol and Levi parents of Trig and Tripp. More talk and more details will open the holes in the Palin story. Yes Margaret, I'll send in my donation pledge right away (Margaret = honoree), Advise how to get u confirmation.
|
|
|
|
Name: Ike Turner
|
|
|
So, I guess BP didn't believe in putting a cap on the penis. She just wanted to feel the sticky stuff inside her womb. That is what's wrong with our culture everyone doing as they feel and be damed the future. 
|
|
|
|
Name: Margaret
|
|
|
Sorry, meant last night.
|
|
|
|
Name: Margaret
|
|
|
Reality time, folks. Bristol and Tripp will be on Greta tonight, and thesarahpalinblog.com has a "preview" picture of the two of them. Is she holding him like a mother? Does he look like a newborn? (or a not-yet-born?)
So...what's the next excuse going to be. DD?
|
|
|
Name: Steph
|
|
|
What's funny is that according to a new interview on People, Sarah's pregnancy with Trig was nearly uncovered by one of her daughters who found an ultrasound picture and confronted her mother about it.
Another article on People focuses on an interview given by Bristol to Greta van Susteren on a FOX News segment that aired Monday night. Gov. Palin appeared late in the interview carrying her grandson.
|
|
|
|
Name: Margaret
|
|
|
It's no mystery, DD, why Bristol is "in isolation", as you put it. She is a private citizen who has no reason to expose herself or her baby to hostile people who don't believe he exists and will criticize anything she does. Has anyone noticed that she hasn't taken advantage of the $300,000 she could have got for the pictures? even if there isn't a baby she could have borrowed one for the shoot. They could bring the baby to your front door and you would deny it was there.
|
|
|
|
Name: Double Dupe is on
|
|
|
Bristol remains in isolation for some reason. I'm still waiting for the end play. (i.e show Tripp, report Tripp adopted or gone for whatever reason, admit to fraud, etc.). Perhaps as time goes by we'll just forget how a lie, covered a lie, covered a lie. Tripp born 12/28 (lie), Bristol 5 months 9/1 (lie), Sarah had Trig 4/18 (lie). Never bought it, probably never will.
|
|
|
|
Name: frank burns
|
|
|
Bristol was pregnant, she just wasn't five months pregnant in August. The baby wasn't born in December, and isn't born yet. Just as soon as it is born, the pictures will be out, dated December, of course. Palin thinks she is pretty smart, but she hasn't gotten everybody fooled.
|
|
|
|
Name: KayJay90
|
|
|
Sarah Palin: From virtually flat stomach March 26, 2008 (3 weeks after her "pregnancy" announcement) to robust 8-month appearance of pregnancy April 13, 2008. How did she do it??
|
|
|
Name: Steph
|
|
|
Sarah "made" Bristol and Levi walk across the stage holding hands? They're young. And in love. I'm older than her and I wouldn't think twice about walking across a stage holding the hand of the man I loved.
Try and drum up another thing that Sarah "made" Bristol (and Levi for that matter) do.
I can't blame Bristol for not going out in the winter with her newborn baby. I know a lot of people who stay home with their newborns during Michigan winters because they don't want to expose their newborns to the cold temperatures and I don't blame them. A newborn doesn't need to be out at Target, Walmart, or anywhere else, especially when it's winter and a lot of people are sick. A baby can get sick a lot easier than you and I can, which is why they should stay home for several weeks before they go to a store to be shown off.
|
|
|
|
Name: Margaret
|
|
|
All the "loving pictures of Bristol and Trig" were taken before Tripp was born, most of them at the Republican convention. Have you seen ANY pictures since?
|
|
|
|
Name: Margaret
|
|
|
How about: No way an 18-year old who just gave birth would expose her five-week old child to the freezing cold, dark, miserable Alaskan winter, as opposed to staying inside, cosy and warm, with her family? Particularly since there are dozens of piranha photographers hovering around, just itching to sell photos to be splashed all over the tabloid press? For heavens sake, she's 18, not 30...she has a boyfriend, mother, father, grandparents and friends who I'm sure are happy to save her from having to venture out in the snow to buy groceries.
Do you even know she is in Wasilla? why would she not be in the governor's mansion in Juneau?
This is another example of the unfounded suppositions this Trig theory is based on: the only FACT is that no gossip reporter has been invited in to trash the family again. Outside of anti-Palin bias, who can say with a straight face that this logically means that the baby doesn't exist? (I don't think we've seen a picture of Trig recently either - does that mean he has been vaporized?)
When a picture of Tripp finally does surface (probably on the governor's site), will everyone here back down from saying Palin (and half of Wasilla) lied about the baby being born, or will they dredge up another unsubstantiated interpretation to declare the photo a fake/(I'm looking at you too, DD)
|
|
|
|
Name: AnnieOkie
|
|
|
Reply to Steph Jan 27.2009........
Falsely accused ? Really ? Sarah Palin told the whole world her daughter was pregnant to throw the news media in a different direction....to cover up her own deception. She even made Bristol and Levi walk across the stage hand in hand in front of millions of people to show the world how much in love they were and let it be known the two would marry before the baby was born. Still no marriage...still no pictures of the happy event....what are they waiting for ? The highest bidder ? Or could it be the baby has not been born yet? Something is very fishy here......Even people from Alaska have said....no one has seen a new baby.....There are many loving photos of Bristol and Trig, but none of Bristol and Tripp...  : :
|
|
|
|
Name: Beachwriter
|
|
|
 I live in Anchorage, Alaska and I have been eager to see pictures of Bristol and the baby. Any picture at all, getting in her car, carrying the baby in a his car seat, shopping at Target...but there has not been ONE picture in five weeks. Wasilla is a tiny community, one Wal-Mart, one Sears, one Target etc. There is no way an 18 year old is going to barricade herself with a child in the freezing cold, dark, miserable Alaskan winter for five weeks. No one has seen Bristol or her baby. WHY??
I never bought into the theory that Trigg is Bristol's baby until now. But after this and reviewing the events of Sarah's supposed birth of Trigg I am becoming more convinced that there is no Tripp. A trooper who did security detail for Palin also disclosed that an officer traveled with her on every trip except one. The trip she took to Texas, the one she flew back to Alaska from- while in labor. What are the odds?
|
|
|
Name: Yellowgirl
|
|
|
For those interested in the LACK of a picture of the allegedly born a month ago Tripp Palin, check out Morgan's site which shows the day-by-day weirdness of Bristol's "5 month pregnant" belly at the RNC in September....
www dot palinpics4truth dot blogspot dot com
You might also check out this excellent site of the issues around Trig's birth:
www dot palin deception dot com dot index dot html
and its related blog,
www dot palin deception dot com/blog/
Something is NOT right with this story!
|
|
|
|
Name: Margaret
|
|
|
I am also a believer in free speech, so everyone is as just as much entitled to their opinions as I am. To my mind, though, opinions don't have much value if they are not backed up by facts and logic. To go along with the majority opinion here I have to believe that there is a massive conspiracy of literally hundreds of people, and not one of all of these people has thought about raking in the instant fame and thousands of dollars they could get by talking to the Enquirer and such. Further, despite dozens of reporters digging for dirt there is not one single reporter who has come up with one single fact to support this theory which is currently only supported by suppositions (eg there was no entry on the *voluntary* hospital website) and interpretations of photographs (eg the way Bristol "looks at" the baby). Against that you have the FACT that DS babies are highly unlikely for teenage pregnancies, the FACT that it is medically impossible for Bristol to have given birth to both babies, the FACT that the doctor issued an unequivocal statement that Sarah Palin gave birth in April, the FACT that many of the so-called conspirators (like newspaper reporters, medical staff, McCain staff and even Laura Bush) have no good reason to perjure themseves just to cover up what would be a relatively minor "scandal" (teenage daughter pregnant) and the FACT, which I pointed out in my last post, that the above baby bump picture couldn't possibly have been taken in the fall of 2007. If you get to the point where everything that doesn't agree with your opinion is because "somebody is lying" then there's not much point in having a debate. Regardless, I am intrigued how people here, who are probably perfectly sensible and nice in real life, are still hounding and trashing a young teenage girl who is not a public figure in any way, and her mother who no longer has any political significance outside of Alaska.
With regard to the pictures, judging by the publicity of the birth story this would cause a massive media furore and the Palins would then be ragged on for seeking publicity. At the same time there would be allegations that it was a fake photo or an imposter baby. They can't win.
THAT's the main reason I defend them, because I don't believe they are being treated fairly.
|
|
|
|
Name: Steph
|
|
|
Sarah Palin couldn't wait to tell the whole world that Bristol was pregnant? Really? The ONLY reason they announced that Bristol was pregnant with Tripp was because the media was falsely accusing the Palins of a coverup in regards to Trig and saying that Bristol was actually the mother of Trig, not Sarah.
|
|
|
|
Name: AnnieOkie
|
|
|
I was wondering the same thing....Kay, Palin couldnt wait to tell the whole world Bristol was pregnant...which the way I see it....was really no ones business except Bristol and Levi's, but for her own personal gain, SP exposed her own daughter. Now since the happy event has supposedly taken place.....I have to wonder why no bragging pictures?
|
|
|
|
Name: Kay
|
|
|
Margaret, I am a firm believer in freedom of speech, but I really don't understand why you keep defending the Palin family. Are you arguing for argument's sake? I have one question for you: It has been one month since baby Tripp was born. Where are the pictures?
|
|
|